<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com." xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - U.S. online advertising grows by more than 10% in 2009? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/u-s-online-advertising-grows-10-2009</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;U.S. online advertising grows by more than 10% in 2009?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Though the economy has</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/u-s-online-advertising-grows-10-2009#comment-9287</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Though the economy has slashed big profits of the overall advertising industry - including both traditional and new media advertising, the relative low cost of online advertising (plus its &#039;measurable&#039; features such as clicks) could steer more companies to spend more on internet ads and less on traditional media.&lt;br /&gt;
So I bet yes on this prediction. :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:16:00 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Liv Jin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9287 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I originally had it that way</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/u-s-online-advertising-grows-10-2009#comment-9079</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;I originally had it that way but shortened it to &quot;by&quot; in the header to make it less wordy. The gist of it is still the same, in my opinion. But I switched back per your suggestion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In regards to other prediction, I sense that the trend will be the same, but I believe IAB will come out with their annual report within a month, which is why I wanted to wait before closing that out. Will take a look.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:49:29 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Yi-Wyn Yen167771</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9079 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Yi-Wyn, suggest that the</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/u-s-online-advertising-grows-10-2009#comment-9077</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Yi-Wyn, suggest that the prediction heading be modified to be&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;U.S. online advertising grows by &lt;strong&gt;over&lt;/strong&gt; 10% in 2009?&quot; to be consistent with prediction body verbiage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Incidentally, can you look into the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/ad-spending-will-shift-impression-performance-based-marketing-2008&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Ad spending will shift from impression to performance-based marketing in 2008&lt;/a&gt; prediction that is being judged. According IAB 2008 Q3 report, it already shows performance-based marketing with more market share than impression-based. IMO, it has sufficient data to support rendering of judgment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:26:28 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9077 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>U.S. online advertising grows by more than 10% in 2009?</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/u-s-online-advertising-grows-10-2009</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The growth of online advertising dramatically slowed in 2008 with the start of the economic recession. After several years of healthy growth, U.S. spending for online advertising dropped by less than half, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?id=1006766&quot;&gt;from 25% in 2007 to 12% in 2008&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Analysts forecast Internet ad spend will rise only &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?id=1006766&quot;&gt;10% in 2009&lt;/a&gt;. eMarketer estimates that total U.S. online spend for &#039;08 was $23.6 billion and this year will reach $25.7 billion. IDC&#039;s latest &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=215517&quot;&gt;Internet Advertising Quarterly&lt;/a&gt; report also suggests that the growth has faltered. In Q3 2008 report says that &amp;quot;total U.S. advertising spending increased by 9.4% to $6.67 billion from $6.09 billion in the same quarter a year ago.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Others claim that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/11/bullish-emarketer-chops-online-ad-forecast-still-too-bullish&quot;&gt;10% prediction will get slashed again&lt;/a&gt; with expectations of a deepening recession.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Prediction: Will online ad spend in the U.S. Internet advertising continue to grow by more than 10% in 2009? This prediction will be judged once the IDC&#039;s U.S. Internet Advertising Quarterly Wrap-up 3Q 2009 report is released to the public in December 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 11px&quot; id=&quot;_oneup&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/u-s-online-advertising-grows-10-2009#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/12774">co: IDC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/14194">display advertising</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/787">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/14193">internet ads</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/2501">online advertising</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/14195">search advertising</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/5667">Software &amp;amp; Web</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/1034">Yahoo</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:39:04 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Yi-Wyn Yen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">123864 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
